Section 17.136.040 Standards.
All communication facilities must demonstrate compliance with the following
standards
prior to city approval.
A. Preferred Communication Facilities. The order of preference
for new or reconstructed
permanent communication facilities is as follows from most preferred to least preferred:
1. Co-location on existing communication facilities.
If not technically feasible;
2. Antennas attached to existing commercial or industrial
buildings or structures. If not
technically feasible, then:
a. Concealed Antennas. If not technically feasible,
b. Microcell Antenna Towers. If not technically feasible,
then
c. New communication facilities tower.
In addition to the above-listed preferences, it is preferred that any new facilities
be located on
public lands or structures.
B. Facilities in Relation to Scenic View Shed and Historic
or Cultural Resources. Facilities
shall not create an unreasonable adverse impact toward the view from any public park, natural
resource area or historic or cultural site. In determining the potential adverse impact of the
proposed facility upon such area; the Land Services Department shall consider the following
factors:
1. The extent to which the proposed communication facility
is visible from the viewpoint(s)
of the impacted resource;
2. The type, number, height and proximity of existing
structures and features and
background features within the same line of sight as the proposed facility;
3. The amount of vegetative screening;
4. The distance of the proposed facility from the impacted
resource; and
5. The presence of reasonable alternatives that allow
the facility to function consistently
with its purpose.
C. Communication Facilities Spacing Requirements. Antenna
towers over sixty (60) feet in
height shall be located at least five thousand two hundred eighty (5,280) feet from any other
communication facility over sixty (60) feet in height. Antenna towers proposed to be located
closer than five thousand two hundred eighty (5,280) feet from any other communication facility
over sixty (60) feet in height shall be co-located. Exception to spacing requirements may only be
allowed if co-location is scientifically proven to be unfeasible and/or where it can be
demonstrated that a unique hardship exists to prevent compliance with this section.
D. Minimum Setback Requirement.
1. From property lines or road rights-of-way, facilities
shall be set back minimum distance
that is equal to or greater than the height of the facility, plus the height of any building upon
which the facility is located, as well as any extensions to the facility (such as lightning rods or
lightning devices), plus twenty (20) feet.
2. Alternative setbacks may only be approved by the zoning
board of adjustment where it
can be clearly demonstrated that the location of the proposed facility will take advantage of an
existing natural or artificial feature to fully address safety concerns, conceal the facility and
minimize its visual impacts.
3. Guide wires and equipment buildings and cabinets shall
be set back from all property
lines a minimum of twenty (20) feet.
4. The maximum height of any facility shall not exceed
three hundred (300) feet, which
shall include the height of any building on which the facility is located.
E. Equipment Design. The following equipment design standards
shall apply to all new
communication facilities:
1. Attached antennas on a roof may extend up to fifteen
(15) feet over the height of the
building or structure.
2. Attached antennas on a roof shall be located as close
to the center of the roof as possible.
3. Attached antennas mounted on a building or structure
wall shall be as flush to the wall as
technically possible, and shall not project above the top of the wall.
4. Attached antennas and equipment shall be located,
painted and/or screened to be
architecturally and visually compatible with the building or structure it is attached on.
5. Microcell towers shall be painted or coated in a uniform
non-reflective color that blends
with the surrounding building and/or the natural environment. The use of wood poles is further
encouraged.
6. Communication facility antenna towers shall not be
artificially lighted except as required
by the FAA or other state or federal agency. If safety lighting is required by the FAA, the use of
red beacons is preferred to flashing strobe lights. Security lighting on the site may be mounted up
to twenty (20) feet in height, and shall utilize cut-off lighting directed towards the ground to
reduce light pollution, prevent offsite light spillage and avoid illuminating the tower.
7. Equipment buildings shall be compatible with the architectural
style of the surrounding
built environment considering exterior materials, roof form, scale, mass, color, texture and
character. Equipment cabinets shall be located, painted and/or screened to be architecturally and
visually compatible with the surrounding built and/or natural environment.
8. Equipment shall not generate noise in excess of federal,
state and local noise regulations.
This does not apply to generators used in emergency situations where the regular power supply
for a facility is temporarily interrupted.
F. Site Design. All communication facilities shall be
designed to blend into the surrounding
environment to the greatest extent possible. The following measures shall be implemented:
1. Screening and landscaping appropriate to the context
and in harmony with the character
of the surrounding environment is required when any part of the facility is visible from a public
right-of-way or adjacent residential use. Natural materials shall be used for screening and
fencing. Wire fencing, if utilized, shall be screened from public view. If a facility fronts on a
public road or abuts a residential use, a combination of hedges and/or evergreen trees (at least
four feet in height when planted) shall be planted along the roadway or around the facility to
provide a continuous visual screen. Towers and antenna support structures shall be finish coated
in a uniform non-reflective color that blends with the surrounding environment.
2. Existing vegetation and grades on the site shall be
preserved to the extent possible.
3. Signage at the site is limited to non-illuminated
warning and equipment identification
signs. This does not apply to concealed antennas that are incorporated into freestanding signs.
4. Communication facilities shall not include staffed
offices, long-term vehicle storage or
other outdoor storage, or other uses needed to send, receive or relay transmissions.
G. Radio Frequency Emission Standards. All existing and
proposed communication
facilities are prohibited from exceeding or causing other facilities to exceed the radio frequency
emission standards specified by Part 1, practice and procedure, Title 47 of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Section 1.1310, Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure Limits. A statement by a
licensed professional engineer shall be provided demonstrating that the proposed facility
complies with all FCC standards for radio emissions.
H. Co-Location Requirements for Communication Facilities.
1. Communication facility providers shall cooperate to
achieve co-location of facilities and
equipment. Communication facility providers shall not act to exclude other providers from co-locating
on the same tower or electronic communications site when co-location is structurally
and technically feasible. Competitive conflicts shall not be considered adequate reason to
preclude co-location.
2. In addition to equipment proposed for the applicant
s use, proposed communication
facilities shall be designed in all respects to accommodate both the applicant s antenna and
comparable antenna for at least two additional users if the antenna tower is over one hundred
(100) feet in height, or for at least one additional user if the antenna is between sixty (60) feet
and one hundred (100) feet in height.
3. No new tower shall be permitted unless the applicant
clearly demonstrates that no
existing tower or structure can accommodate the applicant s proposed antenna by co-locating.
Evidence submitted to demonstrate that no existing tower or structure can accommodate the
applicant s proposed antenna may consist of the following. The term "existing" includes
pending
applications, as well as approved applications for proposed, but not yet constructed, towers,
antennas and facilities:
a. No existing towers or structures are located within
the geographic area to meet the
applicant s engineering requirements;
b. Existing towers or structures are not of sufficient
height to meet the applicant s
engineering requirements;
c. Existing towers or structures do not have sufficient
structural strength to support the
applicant s proposed antenna and related equipment, and cannot be reinforced to provide
sufficient strength;
d. The applicant s proposed antenna would cause
electromagnetic interference with the
antenna on the existing tower or structure, or the antenna on the existing tower and structures
would cause interference with the applicant s proposed antenna;
e. The fees or costs required to share an existing tower
or structure, or to adopt an existing
tower or structure for co-location are unreasonable. Costs below new tower development are
presumed reasonable;
f. Property owners, or owners of existing towers or structure
are unwilling to accommodate
the applicant s needs;
g. The applicant clearly demonstrates that there are
other limiting factors that render
existing towers and structures unsuitable.
I. Abandonment. Communication facilities will be considered
to be abandoned if they are
unused by all providers at the facility for a period of one hundred eighty (180) consecutive days.
Determination of abandonment shall be made by the Director of Land Services, who shall have
the right to require documentation from the facility owner regarding the tower or antenna usage.
Upon determination of abandonment, the facility owner shall have ninety (90) days to:
1. Re-use the facility or transfer the facility to another
owner who will re-use it; or
2. Remove the Facility. If the facility is not re-used
or removed within ninety (90) days of
determination of abandonment, the city may remove the facility at the facility s and/or property
owner s expense.
J. Modification to Existing Facilities.
1. Addition of equipment for co-location of additional
communication facility providers on
existing antenna towers and sites are not subject to additional review if the tower height remains
unchanged. However, a permit is required.
K. Building Codes and Safety Standards. To insure the
structural integrity of
communication facilities, the owner of a facility shall insure that it is constructed, operated and
maintained in compliance with the standards contained in applicable local, state and federal
building codes and the applicable standards for telecommunication facilities, as may be amended
from time to time. This must be shown through a completed inspection process or certification by
an appropriate regulator agency and a copy of that certification sent to Ravalli County Land
Services. (Ord. 225 (part), 2003)